Some years ago I sympathised much and took great
interest in the movement that tended towards the higher
education of women. I still think that every door should
be thrown open and every facility given, both as regards
education and professional employment, to such women
who have mind and strength for the competition. The
great danger of over-educating young girls is that they
are so much keener and work so much harder than boys ;
and even if it does not injure their health, it very often
unfits them for life, and makes them dissatisfied with
their home and its surroundings.
The great objection to the superficial education I
recommend and believe to be so advantageous to the
prosperous, is that it may degenerate into idleness and
332 POT-POURRI FROM A SURREY GARDEN
frivolity in times of prosperity, and so prove an utter
failure in times of adversity, and in the possibility of
having to earn a livelihood later in life. I think most
sensible young women of the present day feel the
necessity of attaining a proficiency in some one direction,
to which they could turn for help in the hour of need.
Very often, however, the occupation that might best be
turned to bread-winning is not the one to which girls are
most addicted in their prosperity. In such a case, when
money-making is not the object, they must make their
own standard, and reach, if possible, a high order of
proficiency ; for to take up any one thing, and then
to do it badly, has a deteriorating effect upon the
moral nature. The superficial beginning which, accord-
ing to my theory, is conducive to largeness of mind,
is a good preparation to later special training. The
only other alternative, which is the worst of all, is if girls
fold their hands and say they are not clever, and that
they can do nothing. With patience and perseverance
every girl can do something. Once a woman has
made up her mind that she has to earn her living, no
concentration of study for the one particular occupation
she has in view can be too thorough or too severe. The
essential requirement for bread- winning is that she should
be able to do some one thing better than the generality
of people with whom she is in competition.
Now we come to the eternal and ever-discussed
question, what young girls should read. I have no
hesitation in saying that, taking the question all round,
the safest, wisest, most sensible way out of the difficulty,
is to let girls read from childhood anything they like.
Never make a child come and ask, never forbid this book
or that ; the moment you do, you get into a sea of hopeless
difficulties. Where a girl is pure-minded, nothing will
hurt her ; where she is not, the forbidding of one book
DAUGHTERS 333
and allowing another raises a curiosity which will do far
more harm than leaving it alone. All that is harmful in
the Bible or Shakespeare is simply not understood. Why
should it not be the same with other books? No one
ever dreams of what they do not know. Dreams often
distort and twist our knowledge ; no dream ever instructs
us in anything of which we are ignorant.
Page 196
Presented as published in 1898. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
Some years ago I sympathised much and took great
interest in the movement that tended towards the higher
education of women. I still think that every door should
be thrown open and every facility given, both as regards
education and professional employment, to such women
who have mind and strength for the competition. The
great danger of over-educating young girls is that they
are so much keener and work so much harder than boys ;
and even if it does not injure their health, it very often
unfits them for life, and makes them dissatisfied with
their home and its surroundings.
The great objection to the superficial education I
recommend and believe to be so advantageous to the
prosperous, is that it may degenerate into idleness and
332 POT-POURRI FROM A SURREY GARDEN
frivolity in times of prosperity, and so prove an utter
failure in times of adversity, and in the possibility of
having to earn a livelihood later in life. I think most
sensible young women of the present day feel the
necessity of attaining a proficiency in some one direction,
to which they could turn for help in the hour of need.
Very often, however, the occupation that might best be
turned to bread-winning is not the one to which girls are
most addicted in their prosperity. In such a case, when
money-making is not the object, they must make their
own standard, and reach, if possible, a high order of
proficiency ; for to take up any one thing, and then
to do it badly, has a deteriorating effect upon the
moral nature. The superficial beginning which, accord-
ing to my theory, is conducive to largeness of mind,
is a good preparation to later special training. The
only other alternative, which is the worst of all, is if girls
fold their hands and say they are not clever, and that
they can do nothing. With patience and perseverance
every girl can do something. Once a woman has
made up her mind that she has to earn her living, no
concentration of study for the one particular occupation
she has in view can be too thorough or too severe. The
essential requirement for bread- winning is that she should
be able to do some one thing better than the generality
of people with whom she is in competition.
Now we come to the eternal and ever-discussed
question, what young girls should read. I have no
hesitation in saying that, taking the question all round,
the safest, wisest, most sensible way out of the difficulty,
is to let girls read from childhood anything they like.
Never make a child come and ask, never forbid this book
or that ; the moment you do, you get into a sea of hopeless
difficulties. Where a girl is pure-minded, nothing will
hurt her ; where she is not, the forbidding of one book
DAUGHTERS 333
and allowing another raises a curiosity which will do far
more harm than leaving it alone. All that is harmful in
the Bible or Shakespeare is simply not understood. Why
should it not be the same with other books? No one
ever dreams of what they do not know. Dreams often
distort and twist our knowledge ; no dream ever instructs
us in anything of which we are ignorant.