FoodNet

Pot-pourri from a Surrey garden

1898

Page 179

Presented as published in 1898. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
a little care and study of the ordinary rules of health, and of the watchful eye which is given by every hunting man to his horse ? One word more I must add about convalescence. With the young and the healthy it is a time of hope and even happiness, in spite of mourning over the lost muscles and strength, and the irritating tyrannies of the sick- room. But in long, chronic, hopeless illness modern nursing, with all its real advantages, becomes an active daily trial, only to be borne patiently from the same feeling that makes all work and all trials bearable — namely, for the time being, doing the disagreeable for the sake of the ultimate good. It is our only method of earning our daily bread by the sweat of our brow, the old golden rule of life, which in all the forms it takes is still the one that convinces us that life is worth living, if not for ourselves, at any rate to continue our presence here for the sake of those who dearly wish to keep us. And so all the trials and fatigues of the three hours' nurse's rule HEALTH 303 in the sick-room in the morning have to be gone through as patiently and cheerfully as is possible. But he or she can afterwards sink exhausted on the sofa or bed, and can indeed say with the pride that belongs to each one of us in our tiny sphere, * I, too, have not been idle — I, too, have done my best for those who are dear to me.' But it is weary work, and for the very weak they can only feel how very much happier it would be to be left alone and lie still and unbothered, instead of feeling more tired than after a hard day's hunting. For those who wish to learn, or those who are going abroad or to live in out-of-the-way places, and for those who do not care to have a doctor always in their house, I will name a few books written for the public by medical men and women of distinction and of great experience, and who are in no sense of the word quacks. The great difference, so far as I can see, between the books of medical men and those of so-called quacks, is that the latter have absolute faith in their remedies, and use almost the identical old miraculous words, ' Wash and be clean ' — and this really often answers — while the books written by doctors employ a much more cautious language. To an immense number of human beings the narrow and forcible phraseology has great attractions, and goes a long way in affecting the nerves and mind, which are undoubted and powerful factors in all cures. Where disease is advanced and real, is it not admitted by all systems that alleviation, not cure, is all that is possible ? The simulation of disease is often merely the result of shattered or over-stimulated nerves. I fancy the medical books come near the truth when they suggest that an immense number of remedies and different treatments may all do good under different circumstances. In my opinion the cause of a vast amount of the bad health of the present day is owing to the number of drugs that 304 POT-POURRI FROM A SURREY GARDEN