In most families there is a fairly definite income. When
the amount is not known it is wise to estimate upon the
minimum income and have a surplus, rather than to expend
too much. Seventy-five years ago things cost less and in-
comes were less, to-day the incomes have increased and cost
of living is growing higher. The question is one to be
studied relatively, and the cost of living will depend on the
ratio between income and one's methods of living.
Just what other satisfactions than the merely physical
are to be gratified is the great question for the woman who
divides the income. The problem is naturally hardest with
the smallest income, where the '' must be " crowds out the
'^ may be." But there is room for choice even with the small
wage.
This work of dividing the income and deciding on the ideals
should be shared by the family. When the home is first
started the husband and wife should discuss frankly the prob-
Y 321
322 FOODS AND HOUSEHOLD MANAGEMENT
lems of division and should agree on the methods of expen-
diture. This common miderstanding between members of a
family forms a bond of union, and each feels a greater pleas-
ure and pride in doing his part. The fact that there is a
budget and a system brings orderUness in methods of work
and freedom from worry and anxiety as well as a saving cf
* money. And this saving of money and strength is tjie same
as an increase in income. This budget or division of ex-
penses acts as a sailing chart and can be referred to from
month to month. It should not, however, become a burden,
and one should not worry if every penny is not accoimted for.
Statisticians tell us that about 75 per cent of the male
adults of our country earn somewhat less than $600 a year.
That in large cities $900 to $1000 a year is necessary to bring
up a family to live decently and enjoy human happiness.
Much depends upon how this income is divided as to whether
results will tend to develop efficiency in the members of such
a family. As the income increases from $1000 to $5000 it is
possible to apportion the income and indicate certain per-
centages which represent wise family expenditures so as to
include the higher intellectual and emotional life as well as
the physical welfare of the family.
From comparison of many budgets statisticians have
worked out certain percentages that are helpful in making
oiu* decisions, although they are not to be taken as fixed rules.
Expenditure for food. — On examining the budgets of
families having incomes froim $500 to $5000, it is found that
the percentage spent for f<5od increases as the income de-
creases, amounting sometimes to at least 50 per cent of the in-
come. This means that there is a limit to the money spent
per capita per day for food, below which we cannot go and
maintain Uf e with even sufficient efficiency for unskilled labor.
Figure 77 shows that a $900 income gives about 45 per cent to
THE HOUSEHOLD BUDGET 323
food. An expenditure of thirty cents per capita per day for
food in a family of five with'an income of $1500, is 36.5 per
cent; i.e. more than one third of the total i
FiQ. 77. — Typical divisioii of a Bmall inoome.
gestions as to allowance for food in famiHea of different in-
comes are contained in the tables of budgets given farther on
in this chapter.
Thrift in buying and using is necessary with the small in-
Page 160
Presented as published in 1914. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
In most families there is a fairly definite income. When the amount is not known it is wise to estimate upon the minimum income and have a surplus, rather than to expend too much. Seventy-five years ago things cost less and incomes were less, to-day the incomes have increased and cost of living is growing higher. The question is one to be studied relatively, and the cost of living will depend on the ratio between income and one's methods of living.
Just what other satisfactions than the merely physical are to be gratified is the great question for the woman who divides the income. The problem is naturally hardest with the smallest income, where the '' must be " crowds out the '^ may be." But there is room for choice even with the small wage.
This work of dividing the income and deciding on the ideals
should be shared by the family. When the home is first
started the husband and wife should discuss frankly the prob- Y 321
lems of division and should agree on the methods of expenditure. This common miderstanding between members of a family forms a bond of union, and each feels a greater pleasure and pride in doing his part. The fact that there is a budget and a system brings orderliness in methods of work and freedom from worry and anxiety as well as a saving of money. And this saving of money and strength is tjie same as an increase in income. This budget or division of expenses acts as a sailing chart and can be referred to from month to month. It should not, however, become a burden, and one should not worry if every penny is not accounted for.
Statisticians tell us that about 75 per cent of the male adults of our country earn somewhat less than $600 a year. That in large cities $900 to $1000 a year is necessary to bring up a family to live decently and enjoy human happiness. Much depends upon how this income is divided as to whether results will tend to develop efficiency in the members of such a family. As the income increases from $1000 to $5000 it is possible to apportion the income and indicate certain percentages which represent wise family expenditures so as to include the higher intellectual and emotional life as well as the physical welfare of the family.
From comparison of many budgets statisticians have worked out certain percentages that are helpful in making our decisions, although they are not to be taken as fixed rules.
Expenditure for food. — On examining the budgets of families having incomes from $500 to $5000, it is found that the percentage spent for food increases as the income decreases, amounting sometimes to at least 50 per cent of the income. This means that there is a limit to the money spent per capita per day for food, below which we cannot go and maintain Uf e with even sufficient efficiency for unskilled labor. Figure 77 shows that a $900 income gives about 45 per cent to
food. An expenditure of thirty cents per capita per day for food in a family of five with'an income of $1500, is 36.5 per cent; i.e. more than one third of the total i
FiQ. 77. — Typical divisioii of a Bmall inoome.
suggestions as to allowance for food in families of different incomes are contained in the tables of budgets given farther on in this chapter.
Thrift in buying and using is necessary with the small in-