contained living creatures, such a.s frogs and birds ; such pies with living
birds came yet on the table of Charles I. — also toy-terriers, squirrels,
hares, foxes, and mannikin pages ; thus, the dwarf Jeffrey Hudson was
hidden in, and came out of, a surprise pie at an entertainment of the
Duke of Buckingham’s at Burleigh-on-the-Hill in 1630. A recipe for a
so-called London pie is given in a cookery-book entitled ‘ Archimagirus
Anglo-Gallicus,’ ascribed by its compiler to Sir Theodore Mayerne, the
Court physician, who, however, had no share in its production. The
London pie contained marrow-bones (8), sparrows (18), potatoes (1 lb.),
eringoes, lettuce stalks, chestnuts, oysters (a peck), eggs, lemon-peel pre-
served, artichokes, spices and currants. (Eringoes = campestre,
the fallow-thistle.) A moyister pie (modern Americans would call it a
mammoth pie) was made by Mrs. Dorothy Patterson, housekeeper to
Sir Henry Gray at Howick (1770), which contained many birds, of which
a list is preserved, also rabbits and neats’ tongues, weighed 12 stones, and
w.as moved round the dining-table on a carriage, as are joints at Simpson’s
and elsewhere. Of mince or shred pies .Jeaffreson gives a history and
recipe. Their earliest recorded examples are the veal tartlettes of the form
of cury, consisting of veal, raisins, currants, etc., in a basis of paste, and
covered, called coffins. The expression coffin or trap was applied to patt3’
— or pasty— cases : their contents were called sometimes tartee. Notwith-
standing their antiquity, mince pies were objected to by the Puritans, who
also opposed the use, at Christmas time, of plum porridge, fat pig and goose,
and custards, for reasons which are no longer quoted. Jeaffreson discusses
the decrease in the flesh ingredients of mince pies, and their supposed
ultimate disappearance ; but this was not generally the fact — their decrease
and omission, wherever it occurred, shows a deterioration of the art of
cooking, and a degraded deviation from the finest models of national
tradition. The restoration of royalty after the exhaustion of the Common-
wealth brought with it a reviv.al of French cookery under the literary
guidance of Giles Rose, chief cook to Charles II. He revived marrow
pics and bacon tarts for a short time, after which they disappeared.
MEAT PIES AND THEIR SAVOUR
565
The regulation of the piguancy of meat pies is one of the
most important topics of their philosophy. Those who
of opinion that savoury pies, pasties, and patties are dishes
contrived rather to excite than to satisfy the appetite will
think little of them unless they be highly spiced and made
piquant with zest, curry-powder, forcemeat linings, quenelles,
gravy, fungi, wine, herbs, pickles, and spices. But this is
not at all owr idecuof pie, which, on the contrary, relates to
a substantial nutritive preparation, and, as will be seen from ,
a perusal of the recipes contained in the best magiric works,
is supported by the principles upon which nearly all are
eonstructed, namely, that all those materials which have
an insufficient amount of solid nutritive substance about
them are to be supported by the liberal addition of such
material in another shape, e.g., beef, veal, ham, farce, eggs,
etc. Now, it is just this combination which enables a cook
to reach in a pie a very high degree of savour, while avoiding
the mere piquancy of stimulating preparations.
Page 356
Presented as published in 1895. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
contained living creatures, such a.s frogs and birds ; such pies with living
birds came yet on the table of Charles I. — also toy-terriers, squirrels,
hares, foxes, and mannikin pages ; thus, the dwarf Jeffrey Hudson was
hidden in, and came out of, a surprise pie at an entertainment of the
Duke of Buckingham’s at Burleigh-on-the-Hill in 1630. A recipe for a
so-called London pie is given in a cookery-book entitled ‘ Archimagirus
Anglo-Gallicus,’ ascribed by its compiler to Sir Theodore Mayerne, the
Court physician, who, however, had no share in its production. The
London pie contained marrow-bones (8), sparrows (18), potatoes (1 lb.),
eringoes, lettuce stalks, chestnuts, oysters (a peck), eggs, lemon-peel pre-
served, artichokes, spices and currants. (Eringoes = campestre,
the fallow-thistle.) A moyister pie (modern Americans would call it a
mammoth pie) was made by Mrs. Dorothy Patterson, housekeeper to
Sir Henry Gray at Howick (1770), which contained many birds, of which
a list is preserved, also rabbits and neats’ tongues, weighed 12 stones, and
w.as moved round the dining-table on a carriage, as are joints at Simpson’s
and elsewhere. Of mince or shred pies .Jeaffreson gives a history and
recipe. Their earliest recorded examples are the veal tartlettes of the form
of cury, consisting of veal, raisins, currants, etc., in a basis of paste, and
covered, called coffins. The expression coffin or trap was applied to patt3’
— or pasty— cases : their contents were called sometimes tartee. Notwith-
standing their antiquity, mince pies were objected to by the Puritans, who
also opposed the use, at Christmas time, of plum porridge, fat pig and goose,
and custards, for reasons which are no longer quoted. Jeaffreson discusses
the decrease in the flesh ingredients of mince pies, and their supposed
ultimate disappearance ; but this was not generally the fact — their decrease
and omission, wherever it occurred, shows a deterioration of the art of
cooking, and a degraded deviation from the finest models of national
tradition. The restoration of royalty after the exhaustion of the Common-
wealth brought with it a reviv.al of French cookery under the literary
guidance of Giles Rose, chief cook to Charles II. He revived marrow
pics and bacon tarts for a short time, after which they disappeared.
MEAT PIES AND THEIR SAVOUR
565
The regulation of the piguancy of meat pies is one of the
most important topics of their philosophy. Those who
of opinion that savoury pies, pasties, and patties are dishes
contrived rather to excite than to satisfy the appetite will
think little of them unless they be highly spiced and made
piquant with zest, curry-powder, forcemeat linings, quenelles,
gravy, fungi, wine, herbs, pickles, and spices. But this is
not at all owr idecuof pie, which, on the contrary, relates to
a substantial nutritive preparation, and, as will be seen from ,
a perusal of the recipes contained in the best magiric works,
is supported by the principles upon which nearly all are
eonstructed, namely, that all those materials which have
an insufficient amount of solid nutritive substance about
them are to be supported by the liberal addition of such
material in another shape, e.g., beef, veal, ham, farce, eggs,
etc. Now, it is just this combination which enables a cook
to reach in a pie a very high degree of savour, while avoiding
the mere piquancy of stimulating preparations.