Ude spoke out, but he spoke for himself, and his w^ords were
noble concerning the art of cookery, so far as he and a few others
were concerned. Ude was a florid writer, but he made himself
felt, and he has probably not been surpassed in self-confidence b}'"
any other writer in any other profession. He felt his importance,
and acted upon it ; but in the eyes of many he was "only a cook "
after all. Ude, however, maintained, and there is much reason
in his argument, that to compose an oratorio or opera was an
easier feat than to invent a new enlrce, and that a man of the
requisite natural endowments could sooner qualify himself to
compete wath the Royal Academicians than with the chief
operators in cookery. " I shall," he observes, " demonstrate the
difficulty of the art by some observations in other arts. Music,
painting, and mechanics in general possess professors under
twenty years of age, whereas in the iirst line of cooking pre-
eminence never occurs under thirty. We see daily at the
concerts and academies young men and women who displa}' the
greatest abilities, but in our line nothing but the most consum-
mate experience can elevate a man to the rank of Chief
Professor."
The precise age when Ude served his apprenticeship in
cooker}- is difficult to state; but this is certain: he was not a
youth when he definitively fixed upon the culinary art for his
living.
Again : " Prescriptions, we must admit, are dispensed by
weight and measure ; but dishes owe their virtue to sympath}-,
tact, nervous sensibility, and momentary inspirations."
"The pharmacist," he continues, with that bombast that
rendered him comparatively uninfluential, " is obliged to weigh
every ingredient that he employs, as he does not like to taste it ;
the cook, on the contrary, must taste often, as the reduction
increases the flavour. It would be blind work, indeed, without
tasting ; the very best soups in which you have omitted to put
salt are entirely without flavour ; seasoning is in cookery what
856 PRACTICAL GASTRONOMY
chords are in music ; the best instruments in the hands of the
best professors, without their being in tune, are intolerable."
Speaking of Gonthier d'Andernach, whom he designates
" the Father of Cookery in France," and " a star which shone in
the Reformation," Ude exclaims with emotion, "What Bacon
was to philosophy, Dante and Petrarch to poetry, Michael
Angelo and Raphael to painting, Columbus and Gama to
geogTaphy, Copernicus and Galileo to astronomy, Gonthier was
in France to the art of cooker3^" That was pretty good for
praise ; but he continued, " Gonthier appeared to raise the
culinary edifice, as Descartes, a century after him, raised that of
philosophy. Both introduced doubt — the one in the moral
(or should it be ' social ' 1) and the other in the political world."
Page 398
Presented as published in 1892. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
Ude spoke out, but he spoke for himself, and his w^ords were
noble concerning the art of cookery, so far as he and a few others
were concerned. Ude was a florid writer, but he made himself
felt, and he has probably not been surpassed in self-confidence b}'"
any other writer in any other profession. He felt his importance,
and acted upon it ; but in the eyes of many he was "only a cook "
after all. Ude, however, maintained, and there is much reason
in his argument, that to compose an oratorio or opera was an
easier feat than to invent a new enlrce, and that a man of the
requisite natural endowments could sooner qualify himself to
compete wath the Royal Academicians than with the chief
operators in cookery. " I shall," he observes, " demonstrate the
difficulty of the art by some observations in other arts. Music,
painting, and mechanics in general possess professors under
twenty years of age, whereas in the iirst line of cooking pre-
eminence never occurs under thirty. We see daily at the
concerts and academies young men and women who displa}' the
greatest abilities, but in our line nothing but the most consum-
mate experience can elevate a man to the rank of Chief
Professor."
The precise age when Ude served his apprenticeship in
cooker}- is difficult to state; but this is certain: he was not a
youth when he definitively fixed upon the culinary art for his
living.
Again : " Prescriptions, we must admit, are dispensed by
weight and measure ; but dishes owe their virtue to sympath}-,
tact, nervous sensibility, and momentary inspirations."
"The pharmacist," he continues, with that bombast that
rendered him comparatively uninfluential, " is obliged to weigh
every ingredient that he employs, as he does not like to taste it ;
the cook, on the contrary, must taste often, as the reduction
increases the flavour. It would be blind work, indeed, without
tasting ; the very best soups in which you have omitted to put
salt are entirely without flavour ; seasoning is in cookery what
856 PRACTICAL GASTRONOMY
chords are in music ; the best instruments in the hands of the
best professors, without their being in tune, are intolerable."
Speaking of Gonthier d'Andernach, whom he designates
" the Father of Cookery in France," and " a star which shone in
the Reformation," Ude exclaims with emotion, "What Bacon
was to philosophy, Dante and Petrarch to poetry, Michael
Angelo and Raphael to painting, Columbus and Gama to
geogTaphy, Copernicus and Galileo to astronomy, Gonthier was
in France to the art of cooker3^" That was pretty good for
praise ; but he continued, " Gonthier appeared to raise the
culinary edifice, as Descartes, a century after him, raised that of
philosophy. Both introduced doubt — the one in the moral
(or should it be ' social ' 1) and the other in the political world."