Kitchiner was a professed cook in every sense
of the word, for not only did he study the chemistry of cooking
in all its details, but he actually cooked and ate of every dish,
sauce, or anything else that he prepared himself, or of which he
published the recipe, so as to ensure three great points — namely,
that the taste was up to the mark, and the food wholesome and
economical : matters that are not always observed by the first-
class chefs of to-day !
In Dr. Kitchiner's writings there is a good deal to amuse,
even if there is not much to instruct us ; at any rate, though only
a trifle be gained, yet nothing can be lost by a little study o£
our ancient gastronomer's work.
He tells us that it is not right to say that a medical man
cannot write a book upon cookery if he is not a practical cook.
By an attentive consideration of the "rudiments of cookery,"
and the respective recipes, a novice in the business of the kitchen
may work with facility and certainty of success, and soon become
an expert. Dr. Kitchiner was much assisted in his labours by
850 PRACTICAL GASTRONOMY
Mr. Henry Osborne, the excellent cook to Sir Joseph Banks, who
was then President of the Eoyal Society, who had been a great
traveller in his time, besides having journeyed round the world,
where he picked up some foreign novelties and tastes like other
epicures. Several books upon cookery have been written by
physicians : — Sir Kenelm Digby, one of the physicians to
Charles I. ; Sir Theodore Mayerne, a physician to Henry IV.
(in Paris), James I., and afterwards to Charles I. ; Professor
Bradley, Dr. Hill, Dr. Le Cointe, Dr. Hunter, and others. He
says that a physician, who studies the practice as well as the
science of the thing, is the best authority on this subject of
cookery ; but if rve ask whether a woman can write a book on
cookery, we must see what Dr. Samuel Johnson says on this
subject : —
" Some people have a foolish way of not minding, or pretend-
ing not to mind, what they eat ; for my part, I mind my belly" —
and he had one to mind too — " very studiously and very carefully,
and I look upon it that he who does not mind his belly will
hardly mind anything else."
And then, again, he once observed to his friends : " I could
write a better book of cookery than has ever yet been written ;
it should be a book on philosophical principles ; I would tell
what is the best bucher's meat, the proper seasons of different
vegetables, and then, iiow to roast, and to boil, and to compound."
'* ' Mrs. Glasse's Cookery Book,' which is reckoned the best,''
said Mr. Dilly, the publisher, " was written by Dr. Hill."
"Well, sir, this shows," continued Johnson, " how much better
the subject of cookery may be treated by a philosopher ; but you
shall see what a book of cookery I shall make, and shall agree
with Mr. Dilly for the copyright."
Miss Seward — Johnson's housekeeper — observed, " That would
be Hercules with the distaff, indeed I "
" No, madam," replied Johnson, snuffily : " women can spin
very well, but they cannot make a good book of cooker3\"
Women have made a few of them, though, in later years, and
very excellent books they are — being practical if not philoso-
phical or Johnsonian.
Page 393
Presented as published in 1892. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
Kitchiner was a professed cook in every sense
of the word, for not only did he study the chemistry of cooking
in all its details, but he actually cooked and ate of every dish,
sauce, or anything else that he prepared himself, or of which he
published the recipe, so as to ensure three great points — namely,
that the taste was up to the mark, and the food wholesome and
economical : matters that are not always observed by the first-
class chefs of to-day !
In Dr. Kitchiner's writings there is a good deal to amuse,
even if there is not much to instruct us ; at any rate, though only
a trifle be gained, yet nothing can be lost by a little study o£
our ancient gastronomer's work.
He tells us that it is not right to say that a medical man
cannot write a book upon cookery if he is not a practical cook.
By an attentive consideration of the "rudiments of cookery,"
and the respective recipes, a novice in the business of the kitchen
may work with facility and certainty of success, and soon become
an expert. Dr. Kitchiner was much assisted in his labours by
850 PRACTICAL GASTRONOMY
Mr. Henry Osborne, the excellent cook to Sir Joseph Banks, who
was then President of the Eoyal Society, who had been a great
traveller in his time, besides having journeyed round the world,
where he picked up some foreign novelties and tastes like other
epicures. Several books upon cookery have been written by
physicians : — Sir Kenelm Digby, one of the physicians to
Charles I. ; Sir Theodore Mayerne, a physician to Henry IV.
(in Paris), James I., and afterwards to Charles I. ; Professor
Bradley, Dr. Hill, Dr. Le Cointe, Dr. Hunter, and others. He
says that a physician, who studies the practice as well as the
science of the thing, is the best authority on this subject of
cookery ; but if rve ask whether a woman can write a book on
cookery, we must see what Dr. Samuel Johnson says on this
subject : —
" Some people have a foolish way of not minding, or pretend-
ing not to mind, what they eat ; for my part, I mind my belly" —
and he had one to mind too — " very studiously and very carefully,
and I look upon it that he who does not mind his belly will
hardly mind anything else."
And then, again, he once observed to his friends : " I could
write a better book of cookery than has ever yet been written ;
it should be a book on philosophical principles ; I would tell
what is the best bucher's meat, the proper seasons of different
vegetables, and then, iiow to roast, and to boil, and to compound."
'* ' Mrs. Glasse's Cookery Book,' which is reckoned the best,''
said Mr. Dilly, the publisher, " was written by Dr. Hill."
"Well, sir, this shows," continued Johnson, " how much better
the subject of cookery may be treated by a philosopher ; but you
shall see what a book of cookery I shall make, and shall agree
with Mr. Dilly for the copyright."
Miss Seward — Johnson's housekeeper — observed, " That would
be Hercules with the distaff, indeed I "
" No, madam," replied Johnson, snuffily : " women can spin
very well, but they cannot make a good book of cooker3\"
Women have made a few of them, though, in later years, and
very excellent books they are — being practical if not philoso-
phical or Johnsonian.