1894. 'The Natural History of Plants,' from the
German of Anton Kerner von Marilaun, Professor of
Botany in the University of Vienna, by F. W. Oliver
Quain, Professor of Botany in University College, London.
For the modern botanist this book is deeply interesting.
I am, alas ! no botanist, and have no scientific knowledge ;
but to take up the book, and to read a page or two
anywhere, opens one's eyes wide with wonder. It
refers principally to microscopic botany. The coloured
plates are saddening to a degree ; they seem to me all
that botanical plates ought not to be, and somehow
appear to have been affected by Miss North's system of
flower-painting. How valuable would have been her
untiring energy, if the drawings so generously given to
Kew had been either artistic, like Mr. Parsons', or, still
better, from the scientific point of view, botanical and
delicately true, like Jacquin's or Bedout6's, or the drawings
in Curtis's books ! In the chromo-lithographs of these
four volumes we have attempts at the impossible — large
plants in the foreground, with skies, distances, and middle-
distance all out of tone. The wood-cuts are much
better ; some are very good and delicate, especially the
representations of strongly magnified subjects. I bought
the book as bringing illustrated plant-lore down to the
latest date. The account, in the third volume, of the dis-
tribution of pollen is .thriUingly interesting, and is within
the comprehension of the aforenamed ' village idiot ' ;
many of our ordinary garden flowers are figured as ex-
amples. The saddest attempt at a picture is a Brobding-
nagian representation of an Alpine Bhododendron, with
pines and snow-clad mountains in the distance. I may
be wrong, but to me it seems waste of talent and time
NOVEMBER 245
and money to illustrate books in this way. These
illustrations are printed in Germany ; let us hope that the
artists were also Germans.
1895. ' In a Gloucestershire Garden,' by Henry
Ellacombe. I think most people who are personally
interested in their gardens will enjoy this book ; there is
much to be learnt from it, and the second part is especially
instructive. It breathes the true spirit of a garden,
independently of the human element or of book-making.
Canon Ellacombe names many of the old Eoses, now
gone out of fashion, but I rather doubt if he has ever seen
Eedoute's wonderful Eose book. He ends his book with
a warning to the clergy against gardening, as being too
interesting and too absorbing an occupation for them. I
can thoroughly echo this sentiment as a warning to all
young people. It can only be perfectly indulged in by
the lonely or the old, and by those who do not mind
neglecting their other duties, and who say, bravely and
honestly, ' I am quite selfish and quite happy.' But
of course this is the danger of all absorbing pursuits.
I agree with many of Canon Ellacombe's remarks ; one
especially can never be too often repeated : — ' In nothing
is the gardener's skill more shown than in the judicious
use of the pruning-knife.' His experience of the American
Bramble is exactly mine — as far as the fruit goes ; it is
not worth growing, as the fruit is less in quantity and
inferior in quality to our own wild Brambles. But the cut
leaf is prettier, and at any rate makes a variety.
Page 145
Presented as published in 1898. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
1894. 'The Natural History of Plants,' from the
German of Anton Kerner von Marilaun, Professor of
Botany in the University of Vienna, by F. W. Oliver
Quain, Professor of Botany in University College, London.
For the modern botanist this book is deeply interesting.
I am, alas ! no botanist, and have no scientific knowledge ;
but to take up the book, and to read a page or two
anywhere, opens one's eyes wide with wonder. It
refers principally to microscopic botany. The coloured
plates are saddening to a degree ; they seem to me all
that botanical plates ought not to be, and somehow
appear to have been affected by Miss North's system of
flower-painting. How valuable would have been her
untiring energy, if the drawings so generously given to
Kew had been either artistic, like Mr. Parsons', or, still
better, from the scientific point of view, botanical and
delicately true, like Jacquin's or Bedout6's, or the drawings
in Curtis's books ! In the chromo-lithographs of these
four volumes we have attempts at the impossible — large
plants in the foreground, with skies, distances, and middle-
distance all out of tone. The wood-cuts are much
better ; some are very good and delicate, especially the
representations of strongly magnified subjects. I bought
the book as bringing illustrated plant-lore down to the
latest date. The account, in the third volume, of the dis-
tribution of pollen is .thriUingly interesting, and is within
the comprehension of the aforenamed ' village idiot ' ;
many of our ordinary garden flowers are figured as ex-
amples. The saddest attempt at a picture is a Brobding-
nagian representation of an Alpine Bhododendron, with
pines and snow-clad mountains in the distance. I may
be wrong, but to me it seems waste of talent and time
NOVEMBER 245
and money to illustrate books in this way. These
illustrations are printed in Germany ; let us hope that the
artists were also Germans.
1895. ' In a Gloucestershire Garden,' by Henry
Ellacombe. I think most people who are personally
interested in their gardens will enjoy this book ; there is
much to be learnt from it, and the second part is especially
instructive. It breathes the true spirit of a garden,
independently of the human element or of book-making.
Canon Ellacombe names many of the old Eoses, now
gone out of fashion, but I rather doubt if he has ever seen
Eedoute's wonderful Eose book. He ends his book with
a warning to the clergy against gardening, as being too
interesting and too absorbing an occupation for them. I
can thoroughly echo this sentiment as a warning to all
young people. It can only be perfectly indulged in by
the lonely or the old, and by those who do not mind
neglecting their other duties, and who say, bravely and
honestly, ' I am quite selfish and quite happy.' But
of course this is the danger of all absorbing pursuits.
I agree with many of Canon Ellacombe's remarks ; one
especially can never be too often repeated : — ' In nothing
is the gardener's skill more shown than in the judicious
use of the pruning-knife.' His experience of the American
Bramble is exactly mine — as far as the fruit goes ; it is
not worth growing, as the fruit is less in quantity and
inferior in quality to our own wild Brambles. But the cut
leaf is prettier, and at any rate makes a variety.