Surface area and cooking losses. The shape and surface area of the
meat also influence the loss that occurs during cooking. The greater the
surface area of the meat, the greater the area at which losses may occur.
Compact pieces of meat with correspondingly small surface areas give
smaller losses than irregular-shaped pieces with greater surface areas.
Cooking temperature and cooking losses. The cooking tempera-
ture is in many instances the principal factor in determining the percentage
of weight that is lost during cooking. Occasionally time may be a more
important factor than cooking temperature in its effect on the resulting
losses. For example, cooking losses were greater for halves of chicken roasted
at 125°C. (about 250°F.) than for the corresponding halves roasted at
175°C. (about 350°F.). In the former instance, twice as long was required
for the interior of the thigh to reach 85°C. (185°F.). Alexander and
Clark found similar results for very small, poorly finished legs of lamb.
However, in general the higher the cooking temperature the greater the
cooking losses; the lower the cooking temperature the smaller the cooking
losses. Intermediate cooking temperatures give corresponding intermediate
cooking losses.
Method of cooking and cooking losses. The method of cooking the
meat may also influence the cooking loss. A broiled steak may have a far
greater total loss than a pan-broiled one, yet the interior of the meat may
be just as juicy. The radiant heat as well as the temperature reached usually
causes a high fat loss from the edge of the boiled steaks, whereas a pan-
broiled one may have a small fat loss.
240 MEAT
Degree of ripeness. Alexander and Clark found cooking losses de-
creased with longer ripening.
The Losses Occurring in Cooked Meats
The cooking losses vary with the factors mentioned, time, stage of cook-
ery, cooking temperature, surface area, and composition. Usually, the longer
a piece of meat is cooked, the greater the cooking losses; but this is not
always true in practise, for owing to differences in surface area and com-
position of different meats, it is not possible always to standardize all
conditions.
Meats show wide variations in cooking losses. The cooking losses
in meat may vary from 5 per cent to 50 per cent. This is a wide variation.
Obviously, meat that has lost 50 per cent of the uncooked weight is either
very dry or has lost an immense amount of surface fat. Swiss steak was
cooked to determine the effect of different percentages of loss on texture
and palatability of the meat. The ones with 50 per cent loss were very
dry and unappetizing, even for a person who prefers meat very well done.
Here there was little surface fat, because of the cut and type of meat
used. A roast with a great deal of surface fat may suffer a rather high
loss and be far more palatable than a lean piece of meat. But, in general,
a 40 to 50 per cent loss leaves the meat much too dry.
Page 194
Presented as published in 1932. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
Surface area and cooking losses. The shape and surface area of the
meat also influence the loss that occurs during cooking. The greater the
surface area of the meat, the greater the area at which losses may occur.
Compact pieces of meat with correspondingly small surface areas give
smaller losses than irregular-shaped pieces with greater surface areas.
Cooking temperature and cooking losses. The cooking tempera-
ture is in many instances the principal factor in determining the percentage
of weight that is lost during cooking. Occasionally time may be a more
important factor than cooking temperature in its effect on the resulting
losses. For example, cooking losses were greater for halves of chicken roasted
at 125°C. (about 250°F.) than for the corresponding halves roasted at
175°C. (about 350°F.). In the former instance, twice as long was required
for the interior of the thigh to reach 85°C. (185°F.). Alexander and
Clark found similar results for very small, poorly finished legs of lamb.
However, in general the higher the cooking temperature the greater the
cooking losses; the lower the cooking temperature the smaller the cooking
losses. Intermediate cooking temperatures give corresponding intermediate
cooking losses.
Method of cooking and cooking losses. The method of cooking the
meat may also influence the cooking loss. A broiled steak may have a far
greater total loss than a pan-broiled one, yet the interior of the meat may
be just as juicy. The radiant heat as well as the temperature reached usually
causes a high fat loss from the edge of the boiled steaks, whereas a pan-
broiled one may have a small fat loss.
240 MEAT
Degree of ripeness. Alexander and Clark found cooking losses de-
creased with longer ripening.
The Losses Occurring in Cooked Meats
The cooking losses vary with the factors mentioned, time, stage of cook-
ery, cooking temperature, surface area, and composition. Usually, the longer
a piece of meat is cooked, the greater the cooking losses; but this is not
always true in practise, for owing to differences in surface area and com-
position of different meats, it is not possible always to standardize all
conditions.
Meats show wide variations in cooking losses. The cooking losses
in meat may vary from 5 per cent to 50 per cent. This is a wide variation.
Obviously, meat that has lost 50 per cent of the uncooked weight is either
very dry or has lost an immense amount of surface fat. Swiss steak was
cooked to determine the effect of different percentages of loss on texture
and palatability of the meat. The ones with 50 per cent loss were very
dry and unappetizing, even for a person who prefers meat very well done.
Here there was little surface fat, because of the cut and type of meat
used. A roast with a great deal of surface fat may suffer a rather high
loss and be far more palatable than a lean piece of meat. But, in general,
a 40 to 50 per cent loss leaves the meat much too dry.