tures, size, and the stage of cookery, they are worth very little for a guide
in cooking meat. Most of the roasts given in these tables were transferred
to a second oven after searing instead of lowering the temperature of the
oven in which the roast was seared. This gives a slightly longer time per
pound. There may be considerable variation in the time per pound as can
be seen in Table 29. In general, the time per pound is longer with the
smaller roasts. With a very thin roast the thickness of the slice influences
the rate of heat penetration more than the other dimensions or its weight.
TABLE 29
The Time of Cooking per Pound and Cooking Losses in One-rib and
Two-rib Beef Roasts Cooked to Different Stages.
Some Class Results
No. of
Weight
Searing
temper-
Cooking
temper-
Interior
temper-
ature
when
Cooki
ng time
Total
ribs
cooking
in
roast
grams
pounds
ature
°c.
ature
°c.
removed
from
oven
Total,
min-
utes
Time
per
pound
losses,
per cent
One
836
1.8
275
125
55
59
33.0
8.4
Two
1560
3.4
275
125
55
93
38 2
11.8
Two
2331
5.1
275
125
55
100
19.5
10.9
Two
2813
6.2
275
125
56
124
20.0
15.1
One
835
1.8
275
125
65
81
45.0
11.0
Two
1575
3.3
275
125
65
116
33.3
14.9
Two
1626
3.6
275
125
65
140
36.0
14.8
Two
1890
4.2
275
125
65
110
26.3
14.0
One
757
1.7
275
125
75
85
50.0
20.0
1 wo
1603
3.5
275
125
75
190
53.3
21.4
Two
1758
3.9
275
125
75
127
32.5
25.0
Two
2268
5.0
275
125
75
260
52.0
20.2
Surface area. Since time per pound does not give a dependable basis
for cooking meat an effort is often made to express cooking time in relation
to the surface area. Often this is expressed in the following way. The
greater the surface area the shorter the time required for cooking a piece
of meat if all other conditions are standardized. From the diagrams, Fig.
25, it can be seen that this method would give a less variable cooking time,
at least for some pieces of meat of certain shape, than time per pound.
This method of expressing time for cooking is also more difficult to deter-
mine in the home.
TEMPERATURE OF MEAT 237
Stage to which the meat is cooked. Cooking meat rare does not re-
quire so long a time as cooking medium well done or well done, because
the last two stages require a higher inner temperature. See Table 29.
The composition of the meat. The proportion of fat and lean in the
meat affects the time required for cooking. There has been much confusion
regarding the rate of heat conduction by fat. In physiology, one is told that
a layer of fat over the muscles prevents loss of body heat, because the fat
is a poor conductor of heat. In articles on cooking various foods, one often
sees the statement that fat conducts heat more readily than muscle tissue.
These two seemingly contradictory statements are explainable. Redfield has
offered a solution. In studying the rate of heat penetration in canning pork
and beef, she found, with all other conditions standardized, that the tem-
perature at the center of the can of pork rose more slowly than the tem-
perature at the center of the can of beef. In order to determine whether
this slower heat conduction in the pork was due to its greater fat content,
she packed some cans with suet and others with beef round free of all
visible fat.
Page 191
Presented as published in 1932. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
tures, size, and the stage of cookery, they are worth very little for a guide
in cooking meat. Most of the roasts given in these tables were transferred
to a second oven after searing instead of lowering the temperature of the
oven in which the roast was seared. This gives a slightly longer time per
pound. There may be considerable variation in the time per pound as can
be seen in Table 29. In general, the time per pound is longer with the
smaller roasts. With a very thin roast the thickness of the slice influences
the rate of heat penetration more than the other dimensions or its weight.
TABLE 29
The Time of Cooking per Pound and Cooking Losses in One-rib and
Two-rib Beef Roasts Cooked to Different Stages.
Some Class Results
No. of
Weight
Searing
temper-
Cooking
temper-
Interior
temper-
ature
when
Cooki
ng time
Total
ribs
cooking
in
roast
grams
pounds
ature
°c.
ature
°c.
removed
from
oven
Total,
min-
utes
Time
per
pound
losses,
per cent
One
836
1.8
275
125
55
59
33.0
8.4
Two
1560
3.4
275
125
55
93
38 2
11.8
Two
2331
5.1
275
125
55
100
19.5
10.9
Two
2813
6.2
275
125
56
124
20.0
15.1
One
835
1.8
275
125
65
81
45.0
11.0
Two
1575
3.3
275
125
65
116
33.3
14.9
Two
1626
3.6
275
125
65
140
36.0
14.8
Two
1890
4.2
275
125
65
110
26.3
14.0
One
757
1.7
275
125
75
85
50.0
20.0
1 wo
1603
3.5
275
125
75
190
53.3
21.4
Two
1758
3.9
275
125
75
127
32.5
25.0
Two
2268
5.0
275
125
75
260
52.0
20.2
Surface area. Since time per pound does not give a dependable basis
for cooking meat an effort is often made to express cooking time in relation
to the surface area. Often this is expressed in the following way. The
greater the surface area the shorter the time required for cooking a piece
of meat if all other conditions are standardized. From the diagrams, Fig.
25, it can be seen that this method would give a less variable cooking time,
at least for some pieces of meat of certain shape, than time per pound.
This method of expressing time for cooking is also more difficult to deter-
mine in the home.
TEMPERATURE OF MEAT 237
Stage to which the meat is cooked. Cooking meat rare does not re-
quire so long a time as cooking medium well done or well done, because
the last two stages require a higher inner temperature. See Table 29.
The composition of the meat. The proportion of fat and lean in the
meat affects the time required for cooking. There has been much confusion
regarding the rate of heat conduction by fat. In physiology, one is told that
a layer of fat over the muscles prevents loss of body heat, because the fat
is a poor conductor of heat. In articles on cooking various foods, one often
sees the statement that fat conducts heat more readily than muscle tissue.
These two seemingly contradictory statements are explainable. Redfield has
offered a solution. In studying the rate of heat penetration in canning pork
and beef, she found, with all other conditions standardized, that the tem-
perature at the center of the can of pork rose more slowly than the tem-
perature at the center of the can of beef. In order to determine whether
this slower heat conduction in the pork was due to its greater fat content,
she packed some cans with suet and others with beef round free of all
visible fat.