a treasure ’’ to-day, packs her trunk and leaves her mistress in the lurch to-
morrow, or, if she happens to have a conscience and works on faithfully, she
becomes the mistress and runs the household in her own way, her employer
living in mortal fear of offending and losing her. This state of things is due
partly to the fact that all girls who go out to service, do so as a make-shift
until they marry or obtain some more congenial work. Few of them have
any ambition to do their work well, and few ever dream of making them-
selves a necessity in the family, becoming a part of it, sharing its joys and
sorrows, and so establishing that honorable and close relation which exists
between servants and families in Europe. Here, it is so much work for so
much pay, and no bond of sympathy or attachment is allowed to spring up
on either side. Another cause is the fact that too many American women,
who ought to know better, regard work as degrading, instead of positively
elevating and ennobling when it is well and conscientiously done. Is it
wonderful that ‘‘ girls’? catch something of this vicious sentiment, and that
it poisons their minds with false views of life, until they look upon their
work as brutal drudgery, and strive to do as little of it as they possibly can
and collect their wages?
Perhaps the reason why girls prefer situations in stores, or shops, or evén
factories, to housework, is that their work there is confined to certain hours,
after which they are free, and it is quite possible that an arrangement which
would give the domestic certain hours of the dey for her own, would work a
reform; or'still better, certain reasonable tasks might be allotted her to do
after which she would be free.
The fixed wages which prevail in most cities and towns offer no induce-
yaent for the “girl”’ to try to become skillful or expert at her work. Among
men the best, neatest, and most skillful workman commands the largest pay,
but the ‘“girl’’:who is a superior cook, or maid of all work, gets only the
same wages paid to a bungler who lives next door. Such a thing as a com-
bination among ladies who employ help, to grade wages and protect each
other from the imposition of untidy, dishonest, or indolent ‘‘ girls,’ has never -
been made, and perhaps, indeed, it is no more called for than a combination
of ‘‘girls’’ to protect themselves from lazy, tyrannical, or too exacting mis-
tresses. Certain it is that the whole svstem by which domestics are hired
and serve is demoralized beyond any speedy reform. All that any individual
(418)
THE MANAGEMENT OF HELP, © ih Ad Gace
ean do is to remedy its evils so far as is possible in her own family. In
employing a new domestic, there should be the utmost frankness. She ought
to be fully informed as to what she is expected to do, what her wages will
be, and how paid, and what privileges will be granted. If she is not pleased,
let her depart without regret. If you engage her, let her understand first
and always that you are mistress, and claim the right to have the work done
in your way, which, if you are as skillful a housewife as you ought to be,
you will be able to show her is the best way. The mistress ought always to
be able to do every thing better and quicker than any domestic ever dared
think of doing it. If she gives orders which betray her ignorance, she may
as well resign her scepter at once in shame and humiliation. No mistress
who does not know how to do work herself can ever be just to her help; and
even when she is a thorough housekeeper, a turn in the kitchen for a day or
two will often be like a new revelation to her.
Buckeye cookery
1892Page 262
Presented as published in 1892. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
a treasure ’’ to-day, packs her trunk and leaves her mistress in the lurch tomorrow, or, if she happens to have a conscience and works on faithfully, she becomes the mistress and runs the household in her own way, her employer living in mortal fear of offending and losing her. This state of things is due partly to the fact that all girls who go out to service, do so as a make-shift until they marry or obtain some more congenial work. Few of them have any ambition to do their work well, and few ever dream of making themselves a necessity in the family, becoming a part of it, sharing its joys and sorrows, and so establishing that honorable and close relation which exists between servants and families in Europe. Here, it is so much work for so much pay, and no bond of sympathy or attachment is allowed to spring up on either side. Another cause is the fact that too many American women, who ought to know better, regard work as degrading, instead of positively elevating and ennobling when it is well and conscientiously done. Is it wonderful that ‘‘ girls’? catch something of this vicious sentiment, and that it poisons their minds with false views of life, until they look upon their work as brutal drudgery, and strive to do as little of it as they possibly can and collect their wages?
Perhaps the reason why girls prefer situations in stores, or shops, or evén factories, to housework, is that their work there is confined to certain hours, after which they are free, and it is quite possible that an arrangement which would give the domestic certain hours of the dey for her own, would work a reform; or'still better, certain reasonable tasks might be allotted her to do after which she would be free.
The fixed wages which prevail in most cities and towns offer no induceyaent for the “girl”’ to try to become skillful or expert at her work. Among men the best, neatest, and most skillful workman commands the largest pay, but the ‘“girl’’:who is a superior cook, or maid of all work, gets only the same wages paid to a bungler who lives next door. Such a thing as a combination among ladies who employ help, to grade wages and protect each other from the imposition of untidy, dishonest, or indolent ‘‘ girls,’ has never - been made, and perhaps, indeed, it is no more called for than a combination of ‘‘girls’’ to protect themselves from lazy, tyrannical, or too exacting mistresses. Certain it is that the whole svstem by which domestics are hired and serve is demoralized beyond any speedy reform. All that any individual
(418)
THE MANAGEMENT OF HELP, © ih Ad Gace
ean do is to remedy its evils so far as is possible in her own family. In employing a new domestic, there should be the utmost frankness. She ought to be fully informed as to what she is expected to do, what her wages will be, and how paid, and what privileges will be granted. If she is not pleased, let her depart without regret. If you engage her, let her understand first and always that you are mistress, and claim the right to have the work done in your way, which, if you are as skillful a housewife as you ought to be, you will be able to show her is the best way. The mistress ought always to be able to do every thing better and quicker than any domestic ever dared think of doing it. If she gives orders which betray her ignorance, she may as well resign her scepter at once in shame and humiliation. No mistress who does not know how to do work herself can ever be just to her help; and even when she is a thorough housekeeper, a turn in the kitchen for a day or two will often be like a new revelation to her.