FoodNet

Bread, cakes, and biscuits

1902

Page 1

Presented as published in 1902. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
Amongst the subjects needing attention in the kitchens of tlii3 country, few deserve it better than bread. It must be admitted sorrowfully that, taken as a whole, both the British housewife and her cook are extravagant and ignorant. In most cases it may be also freely conceded that the former fault is the outcome of the latter ; we do not know how to make the best of the materials we have to deal with, and, consequently, frequently fail in obtaining their full value. It is safe to say that in most households the waste of bread is something almost incredible, and, strange to say, the lower in the social scale usually the greater is the waste. One factor in this is the universal craze for white bread. Now, pure white flour is delicate, of course, but to obtain the purity of its colour a good deal of its nutritive value has had to be eliminated under the most AND CHAPTER I . BREAD. B o BREAD, OAKES, AND BISCUITS. favourable circumstances, whilst under unfavourable ones various more or less harmless additions are made to inferior flour to bring it to the fineness of texture and delicacy of appearance required. Taken at their best these adultera- tions spell waste, for the buyer is paying for a superior article, and only getting one of inferior quality all round ; and one which, moreover, will very likely upset all one’s arrangements, for recipes based on the use of the best materials will not work out correctly when inferior stuff is used, and to this fact many culinary failures are due. But granted this is the worst of harmless adulteration, adul- teration of a less innocuous kind leads to far more serious trouble, so much so in fact that the bread supply and its purity and quality are points it behoves every mother to study pretty closely. There are divers kinds of flour (beginning at the top of the scale), from the delicate Hungarian or Vienna flour, and “ best pastry whites ” (as the very whitest and lightest flour is called in this country), down through “ seconds ” or “ household,” to wholemeal and bran flour. Now, granted that these are all pure, they all have their uses. The first kinds are used for pastry, delicate cakes, and other articles more valued as tempting to the palate than for their nutritious properties ; for bread, “ household ” or “ seconds ” flour is far more wholesome, containing as it does a great deal of the bran, or “ middlings,” as it is technically called, which is really of importance from an hygienic point of view. Lastly, there was a rough kind of flour produced by grinding up the wheat entirely, husk, bran, and corn, just as it came, but this produced too rough a flour to suit modern taste and its use has been gradually aban- doned, until improvements brought in, as a substitute, the well known “wholemeal” flour, which consists of coarsely ground wheat from which only the very coarsest parts of the husk have been omitted. Ordinary brown bread is usually made from this, though sometimes seconds BREAD. 3