In the time of Elizabeth, the price at an
ordinary for a dinner seems to have been six-
pence. It subsequently rose to eightpence ;
tnd in the time of George I. the “Vade
Mecum for Malt Worms (1720)” speaks of
the landlord of The Bell, in Carter Lane,
raising his tariff to tenpence. In comparison
with the cost of a similar meal at present, all
these quotations strike one as high, when the
different value of money is considered. But
in 1720, at all events, the customer ate at his
own discretion.
Their vicinity to East Cheap, the great
centre of early taverns and cook’s-shops, ob-
tained for Pudding Lane and Pie Corner
those savoury designations.
Meals. 253
Paris, like London, had its cook’s-shops,
where you might eat your dinner on the pre-
mises, or have it brought to your lodging in a
covered dish by a porte-chape. In the old
prints of French kitchen interiors, the cook’s
inseparable companion is his ladle, which he
used for stirring and serving, and occasionally
for dealing a refractory garfon de cuisine a
rap on the head.
The Dictionary of Johannes de Garlandia
(early thirteenth century) represents the cooks
at Paris as imposing on the ignorant and
inexperienced badly cooked or even tainted
meat, which injured their health. These
“coquinarii” stood, perhaps, in the same
relation to those times as our keepers of
restaurants.
He mentions in another place that the
cooks washed their utensils in hot water, as
well as the plates and dishes on which the
victuals were served.
Mr. Wright has cited an instance from the
romance of “ Doon de Mayence,” where the
guards of a castle, on a warm summer even-
ing, partook of their meal in a field. Re-
254
Meals.
freshment in the open air was also usual in
the hunting season, when a party were at a
distance from home ; and the garden arbour
was occasionally converted to this kind of
purpose, when it had assumed its more
modern phase. But our picnic was unknown.
ETIQUETTE OF THE TABLE.
PAUL HENTZNER, who was in Eng-
land at the end of the reign of Elizabeth,
remarks of the people whom he saw that
“they are more polite in eating than the
French, devouring less bread, but more
meat, which they roast in perfection. They
put a good deal of sugar in their drink.”
In his “Court and Country,” 1618, Nicho-
las Breton gives an instructive account of the
strict rules which were drawn up for observ-
ance in great households at that time, and says
that the gentlemen who attended on great
lords and ladies had enough to do to carry
256 Etiquette of the Table.
these orders out. Not a trencher must be
laid or a napkin folded awry ; not a dish
misplaced ; not a capon carved or a rabbit
unlaced contrary to the usual practice ; not
a glass filled or a cup uncovered save at the
appointed moment : everybody must stand,
speak, and look according to regulation.
Page 80
Presented as published in 1886. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
In the time of Elizabeth, the price at an ordinary for a dinner seems to have been sixpence. It subsequently rose to eightpence ; and in the time of George I. the “Vade Mecum for Malt Worms (1720)” speaks of the landlord of The Bell, in Carter Lane, raising his tariff to tenpence. In comparison with the cost of a similar meal at present, all these quotations strike one as high, when the different value of money is considered. But in 1720, at all events, the customer ate at his own discretion.
Their vicinity to East Cheap, the great centre of early taverns and cook’s-shops, obtained for Pudding Lane and Pie Corner those savoury designations.
Meals. 253
Paris, like London, had its cook’s-shops, where you might eat your dinner on the premises, or have it brought to your lodging in a covered dish by a porte-chape. In the old prints of French kitchen interiors, the cook’s inseparable companion is his ladle, which he used for stirring and serving, and occasionally for dealing a refractory garfon de cuisine a rap on the head.
The Dictionary of Johannes de Garlandia (early thirteenth century) represents the cooks at Paris as imposing on the ignorant and inexperienced badly cooked or even tainted meat, which injured their health. These “coquinarii” stood, perhaps, in the same relation to those times as our keepers of restaurants.
He mentions in another place that the cooks washed their utensils in hot water, as well as the plates and dishes on which the victuals were served.
Mr. Wright has cited an instance from the romance of “ Doon de Mayence,” where the guards of a castle, on a warm summer evening, partook of their meal in a field. Re-
Meals.
freshment in the open air was also usual in the hunting season, when a party were at a distance from home ; and the garden arbour was occasionally converted to this kind of purpose, when it had assumed its more modern phase. But our picnic was unknown.
ETIQUETTE OF THE TABLE.
PAUL HENTZNER, who was in England at the end of the reign of Elizabeth, remarks of the people whom he saw that “they are more polite in eating than the French, devouring less bread, but more meat, which they roast in perfection. They put a good deal of sugar in their drink.”
In his “Court and Country,” 1618, Nicholas Breton gives an instructive account of the strict rules which were drawn up for observance in great households at that time, and says that the gentlemen who attended on great lords and ladies had enough to do to carry
256 Etiquette of the Table.
these orders out. Not a trencher must be laid or a napkin folded awry ; not a dish misplaced ; not a capon carved or a rabbit unlaced contrary to the usual practice ; not a glass filled or a cup uncovered save at the appointed moment : everybody must stand, speak, and look according to regulation.