of the Hospital of St. Bartholomew at Sand-
wich, under 1569 : — “For tournynge the
spytte, nijd.,” and this was when the mayor
of the borough dined with the prior. A
royal personage gave, of course, more. The
play of “ Gammer Gurton’s Needle,” written
about 1560, opens with a speech of Diccon
the Bedlam, or poor Tom, where he says : —
The Kitchen.
23 7
“ Many a gossip’s cup in my time have I tasted,
And many a broach and spit have I both
turned and basted.”
The spit, again, was supplanted by the jack.
The “History of Friar Rush,” 1620, opens
with a scene in which the hero introduces
himself to a monastery, and is sent by the
unsuspecting prior to the master-cook, who
finds him subordinate employment.
MEALS.
IT has been noted that for a great length
of time two meals were made to suffice the
requirements of all classes. Our own expe-
rience shows how immaterial the names are
which people from age to age choose to
bestow on their feeding intervals. Some call
supper dinner , and others call dinner luncheon.
First comes the prevailing mode instituted by
fashionable society, and then a foolish sub-
scription to it by a section of the community
who are too poor to follow it, and too proud
not to seem to do so. Formerly it was usual
for the Great to dine and sup earlier than the
Meals.
239
Little \ but now the rule is reversed, and the
later a man dines the more distinguished he
argues himself. We have multiplied our
daily seasons of refreshment, and eat and
drink far oftener than our ancestors ; but the
truly genteel Briton never sups ; the word is
scarcely in his vocabulary, — like Beau Brum-
mel and the farthing — “Fellow, I do not
know the coin !”
In a glossary of the tenth-eleventh century
only two meals are quoted : undermeat =
trandium, and even-meat = ccena. That is to
say, our Saxon precursors were satisfied as a
rule with two repasts daily, but to this in
more luxurious times were added the supper
and even the rear-supper, the latter being, so
far as we know, a second course or dessert
and the bipartite collation corresponding to
the modern late dinner. But it is one of
those strange survivals of ancient manners
which people practise without any conscious-
ness of the fact, which is at the root of the
fashion, which still occasionally prevails, of
dividing the chief meal of the day by an in-
terval of repose, and taking the wine and
240
Meals.
dessert an hour or two after the other courses ;
and the usage in our colleges and inns of
court of retiring to another apartment to
“wine” may claim the same origin. It is
obvious that the rear-supper was susceptible
of becoming the most important and costly
part of an entertainment; and that it fre-
quently assumed extravagant proportions,
many passages from our early poets might be
adduced to prove.
Page 75
Presented as published in 1886. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
of the Hospital of St. Bartholomew at Sand-
wich, under 1569 : — “For tournynge the
spytte, nijd.,” and this was when the mayor
of the borough dined with the prior. A
royal personage gave, of course, more. The
play of “ Gammer Gurton’s Needle,” written
about 1560, opens with a speech of Diccon
the Bedlam, or poor Tom, where he says : —
The Kitchen.
23 7
“ Many a gossip’s cup in my time have I tasted,
And many a broach and spit have I both
turned and basted.”
The spit, again, was supplanted by the jack.
The “History of Friar Rush,” 1620, opens
with a scene in which the hero introduces
himself to a monastery, and is sent by the
unsuspecting prior to the master-cook, who
finds him subordinate employment.
MEALS.
IT has been noted that for a great length
of time two meals were made to suffice the
requirements of all classes. Our own expe-
rience shows how immaterial the names are
which people from age to age choose to
bestow on their feeding intervals. Some call
supper dinner , and others call dinner luncheon.
First comes the prevailing mode instituted by
fashionable society, and then a foolish sub-
scription to it by a section of the community
who are too poor to follow it, and too proud
not to seem to do so. Formerly it was usual
for the Great to dine and sup earlier than the
Meals.
239
Little \ but now the rule is reversed, and the
later a man dines the more distinguished he
argues himself. We have multiplied our
daily seasons of refreshment, and eat and
drink far oftener than our ancestors ; but the
truly genteel Briton never sups ; the word is
scarcely in his vocabulary, — like Beau Brum-
mel and the farthing — “Fellow, I do not
know the coin !”
In a glossary of the tenth-eleventh century
only two meals are quoted : undermeat =
trandium, and even-meat = ccena. That is to
say, our Saxon precursors were satisfied as a
rule with two repasts daily, but to this in
more luxurious times were added the supper
and even the rear-supper, the latter being, so
far as we know, a second course or dessert
and the bipartite collation corresponding to
the modern late dinner. But it is one of
those strange survivals of ancient manners
which people practise without any conscious-
ness of the fact, which is at the root of the
fashion, which still occasionally prevails, of
dividing the chief meal of the day by an in-
terval of repose, and taking the wine and
240
Meals.
dessert an hour or two after the other courses ;
and the usage in our colleges and inns of
court of retiring to another apartment to
“wine” may claim the same origin. It is
obvious that the rear-supper was susceptible
of becoming the most important and costly
part of an entertainment; and that it fre-
quently assumed extravagant proportions,
many passages from our early poets might be
adduced to prove.