FoodNet

Old Cookery Books and Ancient Cuisine

1886

Page 22

Presented as published in 1886. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
13. A Curious Treasury of Twenty Rare Secrets. Published by La Fountaine, an expert Operator. 4to, 1649. 14. A New Dispensatory of Fourty Physical Receipts. Published by Salvatore Winter of Naples, an expert Operator. 4to, 1649. Second edition, enlarged: same date. The three last are rather in the class of miscellanies. Cookery Books. 6g 15. Health’s Improvement; or, Rules com- prising the discovering the Nature, Method, and Manner of preparing all sorts of Food used in this Nation. By Thomas Muffet (or Moffat), M.D. Corrected and enlarged by Christopher Bennett, M.D. 4to, 1655. 16. The Queen’s Closet opened. Incom- parable secrets in physick, chirurgery, Preserving, Candying, and Cookery.... Transcribed from the true copies of her Majesties own Receipt Books. By W. M., one of her late Servants. . . . London, 1655, 8vo. The same, cor- rected and revised, with many new and large Additions. 8vo, 1683. 17. The Perfect Cook: being the most exact directions for the making all kinds of pastes, with the perfect way teaching how to raise, season, and make all sorts of pies As also the Perfect English Cook To which is added the way of dressing all man- ner of Flesh. By M. Marmette. Lon- don, 1 686, i2mo. The writer of the “French Gardener,” of which I have had occasion to say a good 70 Cookery Books. deal in my small volume on that subject, also produced, “ Les Delices de la Cam- pagne,” which Evelyn excused himself from translating because, whatever experience he had in the garden, he had none, he says, in the shambles ; and it was for those who af- fected such matters to get it done, but not by him who did the “ French Cook.”* He seems to imply that the latter, though an ex- cellent work in its way, had not only been marred in the translation, but was not so practically advantageous to us as it might have been, “ for want of skill in the kitchen ” — in other words, an evil, which still prevails, was then appreciated by intelligent observers — the English cook did not understand her business, and the English mistress, as a rule, was equally ignorant. One of the engravings in the “ French Gardener” represents women rolling out paste, preparing vegetables, and boiling con- serves. There is a rather quaint and attractive * I have not seen this book, nor is it under that title in the catalogue of the British Museum. Cookery Books. 7 1 class of miscellaneous receipt-books, not made so on account of any particular merit in their contents, but by reason of their association with some person of quality. MS. Sloane 1367, is a narrow octavo vol- ume, for instance, containing “My Lady Rennelagh’s choice Receipts : as also some of Capt. Gvilt’s, who valued them above gold.” The value for us, however, is solely in the link with a noble family and the little touch about the Captain. There are many more such in public and private libraries, and they are often mere transcripts from printed works — select assemblages of direc- tions for dressing food and curing diseases, formed for domestic reference before the advent of Dr. Buchan, and Mrs. Glasse, and Mrs. Rundell. Among a valuable and extensive assem- blage of English and foreign cookery books in the Patent Office Library, Mr. Ordish has obligingly pointed out to me a curious 4to MS., on the cover of which occurs, “Mrs. Mary Dacres her booke, 1666.” Even in the latter part of the seventeenth 7 2 Cookery Books.