§ Francatelli, C. E., ‘The Modern Cook: a Practical Guide to the
Culinary Art in all its Branches, adapted as well for the largest establish-
ments as for the use of private families.’ London, 1816, 8vo.
44
THE SPIRIT OF COOKERY
cookery mainly based on French precedents, while the curing
of meat and fish was described by J. Eobinson.* Graesse,
in his ‘ History of Literature,’ believed that Kitchiner,
whose name is on the title of a celebrated cookery-book, t
was a pseudonym. But this is not the case. Dr. Kitchiner
was a learned physician who lived and practised in London,
was the author not only of the culinary work here quoted,
but also of several other works, amongst them one on
‘ Training,’ and another on ‘ The Preservation of the Eyes.’
A tablet to his memory is fixed in St. Pancras parish
church.
A curiosity is an Indian cookery-book,! translated from
the Persian, published in English. It is not stated whether
any Indian original was or is in existence, and it is just
possible that it was written in Persian originally, though in
India. East Indian cookery, however, never attained any
development as an art, and the Hindoo confectionery, such
as it was, exhibited by imported Indian specialists at
the Food Exhibition in South Kensington, was not only
extremely simple and monotonous, but very coarse, and
repugnant to an educated palate.
We have yet to mention A. Soyer, the author of ‘ The
Gastronomic Eegenerator ; or, A New System of Cookery ’
(4th edition, London, 1847 ; 8th edition, ih., 1852, 8vo., in
which a spirit-lamp for frying an omelette was propounded) ;
also of the ‘ Pantropheon,’ a kind of history of cookery, with
many illustrations and references (London, 1853, 8vo.).
Soyer held a practical position in London during the middle
of the present century, and enjoyed some publicity during
the Crimean War, when he was commissioned to improve
* Robinson, J., ‘ The whole Art of Curing, Pickling, and Smoking Meat
and Fish, both in British and Foreign Modes.’ London, 1846, 12mo.
+ Kitchiner, Dr., ‘The Cook’s Oracle and Housekeeper’s Manual.’
London, 1833, 12rao., 8th edition. The first edition was published in
1817.
J ‘ Indian Cookery, translated from the Persian,’ in the Miscellaneous
Translations from Oriental Languages. T. i.. Nr. v.
THE HISTORIC LITERATURE OF COOKERY 45
the camp-cooking of the troops in the field. He was the
inventor of the hundred-guinea dish, to produce which a
hundred turkeys had to he killed, of which each gave only
the two dark meat lumps from the ischiadic region, called
by the French le, sot I’y laisse, and notorious by Eeyni^re’s
wholesale roasting of turkeys to obtain these bits, from
which absurd extravagance Soyer no doubt borrowed his
owm.
Modern Publications — French and English.
Amongst the more noteworthy French publications of the
present century we have yet to mention M. de Courchamps’
Page 40
Presented as published in 1895. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
§ Francatelli, C. E., ‘The Modern Cook: a Practical Guide to the
Culinary Art in all its Branches, adapted as well for the largest establish-
ments as for the use of private families.’ London, 1816, 8vo.
44
THE SPIRIT OF COOKERY
cookery mainly based on French precedents, while the curing
of meat and fish was described by J. Eobinson.* Graesse,
in his ‘ History of Literature,’ believed that Kitchiner,
whose name is on the title of a celebrated cookery-book, t
was a pseudonym. But this is not the case. Dr. Kitchiner
was a learned physician who lived and practised in London,
was the author not only of the culinary work here quoted,
but also of several other works, amongst them one on
‘ Training,’ and another on ‘ The Preservation of the Eyes.’
A tablet to his memory is fixed in St. Pancras parish
church.
A curiosity is an Indian cookery-book,! translated from
the Persian, published in English. It is not stated whether
any Indian original was or is in existence, and it is just
possible that it was written in Persian originally, though in
India. East Indian cookery, however, never attained any
development as an art, and the Hindoo confectionery, such
as it was, exhibited by imported Indian specialists at
the Food Exhibition in South Kensington, was not only
extremely simple and monotonous, but very coarse, and
repugnant to an educated palate.
We have yet to mention A. Soyer, the author of ‘ The
Gastronomic Eegenerator ; or, A New System of Cookery ’
(4th edition, London, 1847 ; 8th edition, ih., 1852, 8vo., in
which a spirit-lamp for frying an omelette was propounded) ;
also of the ‘ Pantropheon,’ a kind of history of cookery, with
many illustrations and references (London, 1853, 8vo.).
Soyer held a practical position in London during the middle
of the present century, and enjoyed some publicity during
the Crimean War, when he was commissioned to improve
* Robinson, J., ‘ The whole Art of Curing, Pickling, and Smoking Meat
and Fish, both in British and Foreign Modes.’ London, 1846, 12mo.
+ Kitchiner, Dr., ‘The Cook’s Oracle and Housekeeper’s Manual.’
London, 1833, 12rao., 8th edition. The first edition was published in
1817.
J ‘ Indian Cookery, translated from the Persian,’ in the Miscellaneous
Translations from Oriental Languages. T. i.. Nr. v.
THE HISTORIC LITERATURE OF COOKERY 45
the camp-cooking of the troops in the field. He was the
inventor of the hundred-guinea dish, to produce which a
hundred turkeys had to he killed, of which each gave only
the two dark meat lumps from the ischiadic region, called
by the French le, sot I’y laisse, and notorious by Eeyni^re’s
wholesale roasting of turkeys to obtain these bits, from
which absurd extravagance Soyer no doubt borrowed his
owm.
Modern Publications — French and English.
Amongst the more noteworthy French publications of the
present century we have yet to mention M. de Courchamps’