FoodNetArchive

Mrs. Lincoln's Boston cook book

1884

Page 30

Presented as published in 1884. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
Bread made with this flour has been found, after repeated trial, to be sweet and agreeable to the taste, light and spong}' in texture, with none of the objec- tionable features of Graham bread, and answering fully all the demands of perfect nutrition. Cheap inferior Graham flour, made of poor flour mixed with bran, is worse than no food at all. Any flour con- taining much of the indigestible bran causes irritation of the digestive organs ; all the food is hurried through the alimentary canal before digestion is complete or all the nutriment can be absorbed, and thus is neither economical nor healthful. Fine flour containing the most gluten is the most nutritious, because it is all digested, and the loss of albuminous material can be supplied from other sources. The Arhngton, the Franklin, and some other brands of whole-wheat flour, are highly indorsed by those famihar with them. The Tests of Good Flour. The first requisite in making good bread is to use good flour. Good flour should not be pure white in color, but The Boston Cook Book. 43 of a creamy, yellowish- white shade. If it feel damp, clammy, or sticky, and gradually form into lamps or cakes, it is not the best. Good flour holds together in a mass, when squeezed by the hand, and retains the impres- sion of the fingers, and even the marks of the skin, much longer than poor flour ; when made into a dough, it is elastic, easy to be kneaded, will stay in a round puffy shape, and will take up a large amount of water: while poor flour will be sticky, flatten, or spread itself over the board, and will never seem to be stifl' enough to be handled, no matter how much flour is used. Haxall flour has a fine granular consistency, and runs easily through the sieve or the fingers like fine meal ; while- good St. Louis flour feels soft and oily. It is extravagant to buy poor or even doubtful flour. But, should it have every appearance of being good flour, and yet not make good bread, do not condemn the flour without a fair trial ; and be sure the fault is nowhere else. * Every experienced cook has her own tests for flour, and some of them are amusing, if not reliable. The best way is to buy a small quantit}^ at first, and make it into dough ; then, if satisfactor}^, purchase whatever amount is re- quired, and buy this same brand as long as it proves of uniform quahty. The names given to flour are not a sure criterion of the quality. The flour may come from the same growth of wheat, and be ground in the same manner and at the same mill, and yet the miller or the wholesale dealers will brand it diflerently. And the same brand will yary in quality from year to 3'ear. Some of the varieties sold in Boston, and known to be good by personal trial, are Archibald's Extra, Washburn's, Spaulding, Corrugated, Taylor's Best, Brown's Best, Marguerite, etc. ; the same flour may be known in other cities under different names. There are others equally good, and every 3^ear some new brand is announced. It is estimated that one barrel of flour will last one person one 3'ear ; which gives a rule of proportion by which to bu}'. Most good housekeepers agree that flour is not improved by long keeping, though 44 The Boston Cook Booh,