FoodNet

The art of living in Australia

1893

Page 61

Presented as published in 1893. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
with severe pain, great feverishness, and depression of spirits. It was found that the ice which occasioned this outbreak had been taken from a stagnant pond containing a large amount of decomposing matter. A portion of it was carefully melted, and was found to contain a considerable quantity of decaying vegetable matter. In the case of artificial ice, the question of purity is even more important. The reason for this is that the water used in the manu- facture of artificial ice is usually frozen solid, and what- ever substances, consequently, are dissolved in the water remaJD in the ice itself. TOBACCO. Five out of every six male adults smoke, whether it be cigarette, cigar, or pipe. That is, in a gathering of, say, 600 men, 500 -will be smokers and 100 non-smokers. At least, this is the estimated proportion in the old country. In Australia the ratio is about the same, but the average amount of tobacco used by every smoker is greater. Accor- ding to Mr. T. A. Coghlan in his Wealth and Progress of New South Wales^ the annual consumption of tobacco in Australia for each inhabitant is 3 lbs. all but a fraction. For the United Kingdom the corresponding amount is 1"41 lbs.; and for the United States of America, 4*40 lbs. Italy, it would seem, consumes in the same way 1-34 lbs. ; France, 2*05 lbs. ; Germany, 3 lbs. ; Austria, 377 lbs. ; Turkey, 4'37 lbs. ; while Holland reaches the excessive amount of 6"92 lbs. Of the five colonies of Australia, namely, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queens- land, and West Australia, the use of tobacco is greatest in the latter two ; the figures for Queensland being 3*53 lbs., and for West Australia 4H lbs. With regard to the effect of tobacco on the human system, it will perhaps be most convenient to make a 80 THE ART OF LIVING IN AUSTRALIA. division into the following three classes. In the first place there are a certain number of people upon whom tobacco in any shape or form has an absolutely poisonous influence. There must be some peculiar susceptibility of the system in their case which renders them especially vulnerable to its action. On this account, therefore, they are better without tobacco at all, and any attempt to habituate themselves to it must be attended with prejudice to health. Secondly, there are many other people who can only use tobacco in its very mildest forms. They may be able to smoke a few cigarettes daily, perhaps only three or four ; if they indulge in a cigar, it must be one of the mildest ; if a pipe, the tobacco will have to be the very lightest. Anything exceeding their allowance is an excess for which they are obliged to pay the penalty. Then, again, there is a third class who can enjoy tobacco in moderation. But these are the very people who are most apt to abuse their privilege. And although they do not recognise it at once, the effect of their excessive smoking is bound to assert itself at last, and compel them to curtail their allowance. If those in the second category, who can enjoy the mildest tobacco in the smallest quantities, and those in the third, who can smoke in moderation, were never to exceed their proper amount, no very great harm would follow. But it most frequently happens that both overstep their respective bounds, and the result is injury to health.