FoodNet

Food and freedom

1918

Page 34

Presented as published in 1918. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
Meals for a week might.be so arranged that they would provide the correct number of calories, and yet not supply the necessary range of car- bohydrates, fats, proteins, the necessary mineral matter, the peculiarly necessary accessory fac- tors. In order to satisfy his curiosity a physician lived on nothing but sugar for a month; at the end of the month he died.^ The necessary calo- ries were all there in number — but not in kind. Some sugar may be desirable for children, but children who eat their quota of calories in the ^ Cj. Lusk, Fundamental Basis of Nutrition, p. i6. 78 FOOD AND FREEDOM form of candy or cheap cake have no appetite left for the other nutritive elements needed by the body, and trouble follows. Again, meals might supply all the calories, including all the needed elements, and yet be so unattractive in food selection, combination, cooking, flavor, or service that they would not tempt, and to that extent would not nourish properly. To supply all the needed nutritive elements, property balanced, in wholesome, appetizing com- binations, for the money allowed by the family budget, without unnecessary labor, and without ever once forgetting our part in the bigger food and feeding issue of the world, is no small problem in itself. The only way to solve it is through the kind of meals we plan. Family needs, season, local food supply, prac- tical conditions or ideals of living, and the sum of money allowed by the family budget are all important considerations in determining the type of meals served : A meal may consist of one, two, or more foods served as separate dishes, or it may consist of several foods combined in one dish. Simple meals, yet served without loss to any member of the family of the nourishment and happiness which is due, are not only now necessary, but rapidly becom- ing popular as their true worth is recognized. Each meal should be considered in relation to the other meals of the day or week, and every group PLANNING THE MEALS 79 and type of food represented, in some form, in the course of a day's feeding — some carbohydrate, some fat {for fuel), some protein, some mineral matter (for body building and repair), some regulating material, some bulk or waste, some raw food, some hard food. The simplest way to insure this is to serve as much variety as possible; not necessarily at one meal, but in the course of a day — or even the week. In this way — and excepting definite over- or under-feeding — the proper balance of the needed elements will be more or less automatically supplied.^ Few dishes at one meal, and varied meals is a good rule. Variety must not be confused with elaboration. Variety, in connection with meals, is only in- tended to mean that, as far as practical, we should make use of all the wholesome foods wisely provided by nature, and so avoid possible harmful effects of a narrow or one-sided diet. Moderate, varied feeding is a safeguard against eating too much or too little of any one food ma- terial or element. Variety, also, prevents loss of appetite through monotony.