A good mistress in India will try to set a good example
to her servants in routine, method, and tidiness. Half-an-
hour after breakfast should be sufficient for the whole
arrangements for the day; but that half-hour should be
given as punctually as possible. An untidy mistress invari-
ably has untidy, a weak one, idle servants. It should never
be forgotten that — though it is true in both hemispheres that
if you want a thing done you should do it yourself — still,
having to do it is a distinct confession of failure in your
original intention. Anxious housewives are too apt to accept
defeat in this way ; the result being that the lives of educated
women are wasted in doing the Avork of lazy servants.
The authors’ advice is therefore —
“ Never do work which an ordinarily good servant ought to be
6 The Complete Indian
able to do. If the one you have will not or cannot do it, get
another who can.’'
In regard to engaging new servants, written certihcates
to character are for the most part of no use whatever, except
in respect to length of service, and its implied testimony to
honesty. A man who has been six or seven years m one
place is not likely to be a thief, though the authors regret to
say the fact is no safeguard as far as qualifications go. 1 he
best plan is to catch your servants young, promoting them
to more experienced wages on the buksheesh theory above-
mentioned. They generally learn fast enough if it is made
worth their while in this way. On the other hand, it as a
rule, a mistake to keep servants too long in India. Officials
should be especially careful on this point, as the Oriental
mind connects a confidential servant with corruption.
To return to written certificates. Their total abolition
is impossible in India where the society is so fluctuating, but
it would certainly be advantageous if a stand against them
was made, except in certain cases. There is no reason
whatever why further personal reference should not be
requested. In the majority of cases this request could be
complied with, to the great benefit of distracted house-
keepers who, having engaged a
by the seven cardinal virtues, find that the only meut
pLsesses is being the son of a father who having died in the
odour of sanctity, left his certificates to Redivided amongst
his children ! But in this, as in all the ditticultms besetting
Indian housekeeping, combined effort is wanting.
it may safely be said that if Indian servants found cleanli-
ness necessary in every service they took, the Present abom^^^^
tions would soon disappear, for they are natuni ly obedient.
It is always advisable to give neat, durable, ^^ry coats
for wearing when on actual duty in the house. ^^^’«;J^lolotl
is a mistake, being hard to keep clean, and to get h.sty
Good washing serge, such as that to he got at the Big
Mills is best,^ made to fit well, but loosely, with sleeves of
Zner Imigth and width. These coats, in the case of table
Li vants, sliouU liaus on pegs m the pantry, »'« »"'y ^ 1" ‘
„u for actual attendanoe. If carefu ly Itf!
away as the warm season comes on, they ill last i
Jemi For camp work, &c, a counnoner rvash.ug su.t may
Housekeeper and Cook 7
Page 6
Presented as published in 1898. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
AI-modernized reading of the original text
A modernized reading is not available for this page yet. You are seeing the original text.
A good mistress in India will try to set a good example
to her servants in routine, method, and tidiness. Half-an-
hour after breakfast should be sufficient for the whole
arrangements for the day; but that half-hour should be
given as punctually as possible. An untidy mistress invari-
ably has untidy, a weak one, idle servants. It should never
be forgotten that — though it is true in both hemispheres that
if you want a thing done you should do it yourself — still,
having to do it is a distinct confession of failure in your
original intention. Anxious housewives are too apt to accept
defeat in this way ; the result being that the lives of educated
women are wasted in doing the Avork of lazy servants.
The authors’ advice is therefore —
“ Never do work which an ordinarily good servant ought to be
6 The Complete Indian
able to do. If the one you have will not or cannot do it, get
another who can.’'
In regard to engaging new servants, written certihcates
to character are for the most part of no use whatever, except
in respect to length of service, and its implied testimony to
honesty. A man who has been six or seven years m one
place is not likely to be a thief, though the authors regret to
say the fact is no safeguard as far as qualifications go. 1 he
best plan is to catch your servants young, promoting them
to more experienced wages on the buksheesh theory above-
mentioned. They generally learn fast enough if it is made
worth their while in this way. On the other hand, it as a
rule, a mistake to keep servants too long in India. Officials
should be especially careful on this point, as the Oriental
mind connects a confidential servant with corruption.
To return to written certificates. Their total abolition
is impossible in India where the society is so fluctuating, but
it would certainly be advantageous if a stand against them
was made, except in certain cases. There is no reason
whatever why further personal reference should not be
requested. In the majority of cases this request could be
complied with, to the great benefit of distracted house-
keepers who, having engaged a
by the seven cardinal virtues, find that the only meut
pLsesses is being the son of a father who having died in the
odour of sanctity, left his certificates to Redivided amongst
his children ! But in this, as in all the ditticultms besetting
Indian housekeeping, combined effort is wanting.
it may safely be said that if Indian servants found cleanli-
ness necessary in every service they took, the Present abom^^^^
tions would soon disappear, for they are natuni ly obedient.
It is always advisable to give neat, durable, ^^ry coats
for wearing when on actual duty in the house. ^^^’«;J^lolotl
is a mistake, being hard to keep clean, and to get h.sty
Good washing serge, such as that to he got at the Big
Mills is best,^ made to fit well, but loosely, with sleeves of
Zner Imigth and width. These coats, in the case of table
Li vants, sliouU liaus on pegs m the pantry, »'« »"'y ^ 1" ‘
„u for actual attendanoe. If carefu ly Itf!
away as the warm season comes on, they ill last i
Jemi For camp work, &c, a counnoner rvash.ug su.t may
Housekeeper and Cook 7