FoodNet

The complete Indian housekeeper & cook

1898

Page 3

Presented as published in 1898. Historical recipes may not meet modern food-safety standards. Cook from the modern interpretation, not the original instructions.
And, first, it must be distinctly understood that it is not necessary, or in the least degree desirable, that an educated woman should waste the best years of her life in scolding and petty supervision. Life holds higher duties, and it is indubi- table that friction and over-zeal is a sure sign of a bad house- keeper. But there is an appreciable difference between the careworn Martha vexed with many things, and the absolute indifference displayed by many Indian mistresses, who put up with a degree of slovenliness and dirt which would disgrace a den in St. Giles, on the principle that it is no use attempting to teach the natives. They never go into their kitchens, for the simple reason The Complete Indian that their appetite for breakfast might be nuirred by seeing the khitmutgdr'^ using his toes as an efficient toast-rack {fact)-, or their desire for dinner weakened by seeing tlie soup strained through a greasy pngri. The ostrich, who, according to the showman, ides is head in the sand and thinks as ’e cant see no one, as nobodij can t see ’e,” has, fortunately, an exceptional faculty of digestion. With this remark we will leave a very unpleasant subject. Easy, however, as the actual housekeeping is in India, the personal attention of the mistress is quite as much needed here as at home. The Indian servant, it is true, learns more readily, and is guiltless of the sniffiness with which Mary Jane receives suggestions, but a few days of absence or neg ect on the part of the mistress, results in the servants falling into their old habits with the inherited conservatism of dirt This is, of course, disheartening, but it has to be faced s necessary condition of life, until a few generations of training shall ha4 started the Indian servant on a new inlientance of habit. It must never be forgotten that at present those mis- tresses who aim at anything beyond keeping a ® ‘ in the minority, and that pioneering is always The first duty of a mistress is, of course, to be able to give i itehSihle orders to her servaiits ; thei^fore it is nece. Lrv she sho”.ld lean, to speak Hindustan,. No^e woman would dream of living, say, for twenty jeais ii Gennany, Italy, ot France, “SVe anv rate to learn the language. She would, in ^t, teel that by neglecting to do so she would write herself down mi ass It Sid be^vell, therefore, if ladies in India were o ask themselves if a difference in longitude increases the lati- tude allowed in judging of a woman s lect earr'Sd “t ‘ ‘S, 1. 1' te ’Ce" to hurnl^l^^nestlo.r riirir^istbe doner Certahdy, there i^t very little to which we can appeal in the a\e g lervant, but then, until it is implanted by training, theie is 1 The object “^his book being to en^^^^ lately unacquainted decided on adhering through- housekeeping at once, the , j nt used will be the out to purely phonetic spelling. Ihe only aco circumflex. Housekeeper and Cook 3